Monday, November 7, 2011

My Take on Baby Showers

From Dictionary.com:

Main Entry:  baby shower
Part of Speech:  n
Definition:  a party given for a pregnant woman, to which guests bring presents for the baby
Example:  Having a baby shower arranged by a family-member or relative is seen as bad form and self serving by many traditionalists.
Etymology:  1902

Wikipedia (as faulty of a source as any) also mentions that baby showers have traditionally been for the first born child rather than subsequent children.  Baby showers are to impart wisdom to a new mother and "shower" them with gifts that a new mother and new baby might need.  More recently, baby showers can occur for every baby born. 

I used to love, love baby showers.  I loved the games, and the fun gathering, and the excitement of a new baby.    I still do, however, my love for them has waned recently.  Mostly because some of the showers I have been invited to recently have been for 2nd or 3rd kids - when I've already been to a shower for the 1st kid.  Didn't they get "showered" with enough gifts from their first kid?  I was there.  I saw how much they raked in.  I don't know.  Maybe not.  And, on top of that, these showers seem to be given by the pregnant person's mom or mother-in-law.  Is that tacky or "self-serving"?  Also, an e-vite on facebook, to me, does not replace a good ol' fashioned snail mail invitation.